A biology journal that paid peer reviewers found that the approach cut the time to a first editorial decision by 85% and ...

Reviewer 1: "This manuscript is a timely and important contribution to the field, with clear methodology and compelling results. I recommend publication with only minor revisions." Reviewer 2: "This ...

Conference organizers secretly inserted hidden prompts into papers to catch peer reviewers using artificial intelligence ...

A team from Stanford and Bocconi University studied the impact of AI peer review and presented their findings at the ...

Along with running their labs, conducting research, and teaching, most scientists often spend unseen evenings and weekends scrutinizing data and crafting feedback as peer reviewers for scientific ...

Learning to accept criticism through peer review is a difficult but necessary task for young researchers trying to get papers published in a highly competitive environment. It would be hard enough if ...

In their book, Merchants of Doubt, Naomi Oreskes and Eric Conway argue that scientists “know bad science when they see it”: “It’s science that is obviously fraudulent — when data have been invented, ...

Underscores the Company’s commitment to generating robust scientific evidence on its leading MRD technology AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Natera, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTRA), a global leader in cell-free ...

Peer reviewers whose work is cited in the studies they are refereeing are significantly more likely to recommend accepting those papers than if their work is not cited, a new study has found. The ...

Now, I think that the modern peer review of academic articles is better described as the paper money standard. Sometimes, it seems to work in the short run, but it always causes problems in the long ...