Pradesh High Court in Ashok Kumar Kirtiwar v. State of Madhya Pradesh, reported in 2001 SCC OnLine MP 83, held that the State ...
Building on its message of deterrence, the Supreme Court endorsed a powerful procedural safeguard: a mandatory two-month "cooling-off period" following the registration of a 498A FIR. In simple terms, ...
Introducing a "Romeo and Juliet" clause would have several systemic benefits: It would significantly reduce the caseload on already overburdened courts, freeing them to focus on genuine cases of child ...
Section 163A Future prospects or any other additional. non-pecuniary heads find no place and compensation in a Claim ...
Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
High Court of Bombay Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts (Amendment) Rules, 2025.
From the aforesaid decisions rendered by this Court, it can be said that if two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the evidence on record, the Appellate Court should not disturb the ...
Ratio: The Supreme Court held that abusive language alone is not an offence under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, unless it is used with the intent ...
Court and has stood adjourned from time to time due to paucity of time.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Order XXI Rules 97, 99, and 101 — Powers of Executing Court regarding Lok Adalat Awards — Held, while these provisions enable an Executing Court to address incidental ...
Win your case! LawWeb.in: Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results